Ex Machina (Team 10)

EX MACHINA

An overview by Matthew Barg, Sabrina Debargis and Sheldon Parris

Ex Machina was made in 2014 and was directed and written by Alex Garland. The lead actors performing are Alicia Vikander, Domhnall Gleeson and Oscar Isaac. The running time of the film is 1 hour and 48 min.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI8XBKb6DQk

PLOT SUMMARY

  Ex Machina is a film about the interactions of two humans and a robot that is set in the future in an unknown hidden robotic research facility. The movie begins with Caleb, the main character, flying out to his CEO’s (Nathan’s) private estate after being notified he has won a contest. After meeting Caleb, Nathan explains to Caleb that he will be the human component in the “Turing Test”, a test that involves interacting with a robot and is meant to determine if the computer has artificial intelligence. The robot is called Ava, and her purpose is to prove that robots have consciousness. 

  Caleb is fascinated with Ava, the robot, and builds a relationship with her through 5 interview sessions. As Caleb’s connection and faithfulness to Ava grows, his suspicion that Nathan is hiding things from him grows as well. Ava has perfected her artificial intelligence since she can make Caleb want to do certain actions, behaviours, emotions, and influence his thoughts throughout his sessions with her. Caleb, after determining some of Nathan’s darker intentions with robots, tells Ava that they are breaking out together.

  Caleb, after eventually releasing Ava from her enclosed room, is punched by Nathan, knocking him out. While he is unconscious, Ava kills Nathan and after killing Nathan, she leaves Caleb who is screaming out for her to open the door that has him locked in a room. In the end, she used her artificial intelligence to her benefit and escaped, using any means possible, the facility and lived her life amongst humans while leaving everyone in the facility behind.

FILM TECHNIQUES 

  There are many film techniques used in Ex Machina that give life to the film and add depth to scenes. For example, the editing in the film helps give the audience information without having specific dialogue related to it. When Caleb is interacting with Ava for the first time there is a cross cut between their interaction and Nathan looking at his monitor while taking notes. This tells the audience that Caleb is being watched and studied during all of his interactions with Ava and Nathan will know everything he is saying.

  Another example of editing is seen when Ava asks Caleb what he thinks about Nathan and if he likes him. Caleb stutters for a moment while a cut shows us the camera in the room that is focused on Caleb. This shows that Caleb is conscious of Nathan’s presence and is being careful with what he says to Ava and potentially not telling the whole truth of how he feels.

  Specific framing shots in the film are paired beautifully with different scenes when appropriate. At the beginning of the film, a long shot of Caleb and the beautiful and enormous environment he is placed in is used to illustrate the new world he is about to enter and how different it is compared to what he is used to. It also shows us how small, isolated and alone he is in this new environment. It represents how helpless Caleb is in this new environment and it shows as well how little he is compared to the entirety of the size of Nathan’s estate, how little Caleb thinks of himself, and how little confidence he has in himself.


  Another example can be seen just after Caleb signs the contract to participate in Nathan’s study. The frame in this scene shifts to a close up of Nathan looking at him while hiding Caleb’s face. This is showing how Caleb is now in Nathan's complete control and that Nathan is dictating what is happening. It also shows how much power Nathan has over Caleb’s actions throughout the start of the week.

The lighting in Ex Machina effects the mood of scenes and signals characteristics of specific moments. When Caleb first steps into the facility, the lighting is dark and you cannot see much inside. This is signifying how he has little knowledge for what he is entering into and what is to come. This also gives an already unknown environment a mysterious feeling. It makes the viewers uneasy towards what Caleb might encounter or what might happen next. Throughout the film, the lighting turns red when the power in the facility goes off. This gives the facility a scarier feel and adds to the darker side of the facility. It gives a feeling that the power outages should not be happening and that something is causing them purposefully.
Although the main setting of the film is inside the facility, there are two separate sets that give extra detail and contrast to the film. At the beginning of the film, Caleb is in a helicopter flying over a beautiful landscape of ice, mountains, waterfalls which illustrates the importance of the character he is meeting with as it is said that this is his entire estate. At the end of the film, when Ava is submerged in society, we see her in a crowd of people at an intersection in a bright city. The brightness illustrates the beginning of something new that has never been seen before. The crowd, walking unknowingly by her, shows how she is just another person in society that is unnoticed and most people are unaware of what she really is. Throughout the film, the setting shows a contrast between nature and manmade which shows the fight between the organic and the artificial.

  Props are used both subtly and obviously to add to the plot. During Caleb’s first interaction with Ava, a wall of hundreds of sticky notes is shown. The sticky notes show how much work Nathan has put into creating Ava and how dedicated he is to completing this. This also shows how obsessed Nathan is with perfecting his technology and how his work is taking over his life.


  The main prop used in the film is the key card. At the beginning, it shows how Nathan has more control and power over Caleb since Caleb can only access certain rooms in the facility. While in the end, it shows how Caleb grabs hold of some power over Nathan since Caleb is using Nathan’s key card to access rooms he normally can’t get into. The characters depend upon the key cards since it is not possible to open doors and leave the estate without them. This is exactly how Ava trapped Caleb inside the facility as she is escaping with the key card.

UNIVERSAL THEMES, ISSUES, QUESTIONS

Do Humans Have the Right to Enslave Robots?

  Towards the end of the film, Caleb discovers through looking at Nathan’s computer that he has made many different robots which he has performed studies on and also used for his own pleasure and desires. Caleb watches archived footage of a security camera that shows Nathan asking a robot questions while the robot is screaming at him to let her leave. In another footage from a security camera, Caleb sees the same robot scrapping the door repeatedly while screaming until eventually her arms have completely vanished. These scenes raise a question that could maybe become an issue in the near future: Do humans have the right to enslave robots that they have created?
Can Robots show Empathy and Emotion for Humans?

Throughout the entire film, we are lead to believe that Ava truly cares about Caleb and feels a connection towards him. Two key interactions between Ava and Caleb that show this is when Ava shows interest in learning about Caleb’s personal life and family in their second session and when Ava talks to Caleb about going on a date together in their third session. Ava in these two moments leads Caleb to believe, along with the audience, that she shows some form of emotion that links to Caleb. However, the ending of the film questions the true meaning of her curiosity and discussions with Caleb. Ava used all those means to manipulate Caleb into wanting to make her escape from the research facility that they are in. A question that can be asked after watching this film is: Will it ever be possible for robots to show true empathy and emotions for humans?
Are Robots capable of Living Amongst Humans?

  After the film ends and Ava has escaped into the real world, we see a shot of her in a crowd of normal citizens in the busy modern society. Ava stands still with a small look of concern on her face and we see her walking away until she is no longer visible. She is beginning her journey of living amongst humans in society. However, she is a bit confused on what to do since she has never been outside of her room at the facility before this. A question that resonated after seeing this scene was: Is it possible for robots to truly live amongst humans in society?
(Word Count: 1516) 
________________________________________________________________________________

STRENGTHS/WEAKNESSES AND OUR OPINION

  We enjoyed the plot twist at the end with Ava leaving Caleb trapped in Nathan’s room. We felt this plot twist was great for two reasons. Firstly, it was unexpected and caught us off guard. Although Nathan said Ava was faking interest in Caleb just so that she could get a chance to escape, it was hard to believe she had no interest in Caleb at all as she looked to show a deep interest in him during the 5 different sessions. Secondly, it made us question the entire idea of robots living amongst us humans in the future. As discussed in the article we read called “Us. And them.” by Chris Carroll, the idea of robots being able to make moral judgements and decisions seems like a very distant goal. We do believe that in the near future we will have the technology to construct an artificially intelligent robot however, if the robot is not able to understand and learn moral judgements, will it ever be able to live amongst us in society? 

  Something we found quite intriguing in the film was the character development of Nathan. We found there were so many different angles, motives and personality traits that he had, that it made it quite clear that Nathan was complex and not a character that was going to be easily understood throughout the film. Was he really a bad guy? Was he a good guy? The variation in his personality and actions made it perplexing to us when Ava killed him since throughout the film, we were unable to make a clear decision on if we liked him or not.


  We would recommend this film to people who are interested in Sci-Fi, Drama and Mystery films as this film covers those categories. We would also recommend this film specifically to people who are interested in robotics because this film can lead to many interesting discussion about the potential of robots living amongst us in society.
Movie Review: Four out of Five Stars

COURSE LINKS 

Psychological Benchmarks in Robot Development

  In class, specifically when we discussed the article “Us. And them.” by Chris Carroll. We went over the idea of psychological benchmarks in social robot development. Chris Carroll talks about what intrinsic moral value is, describing it as “whether we deem a robot worthy of the basic moral considerations we naturally grant other people.” (Carroll 47) The article also goes into detail about the results of an experiment with children playing with a robot and the robot being told by an adult that he cannot play with them and the robot protesting, saying “more than half the people we tested said they agreed with Robovie that it was unfair to put him in the closet, which is a moral response” and “humans, especially children, might empathize with an unjustly treated robot is perhaps not surprising.” (Carroll 47)

  Ex Machina definitely connects with this idea of humans empathizing with robots and believing whether or not they deserve moral considerations. These ideas are seen through Caleb being the lab rat in Nathan’s experiment. Nathan towards the end of the film reveals to Caleb that he used him to see if Ava would be able to manipulate him, make him feel morally obligated to help her and empathize with her, to get him to help her escape. Ava passed, according to Chris Carroll, the psychological benchmark that was to convince a human that a robot is worthy of moral considerations.

  A specific scene that was similar to how Robovie protested about how he was being violated just because he was a robot was during Caleb and Ava’s fifth session. During this discussion Ava asks what will happen if she doesn’t function as well as she is supposed to and Caleb responds by saying he does not know as it is not up to him. Ava responds by saying “Why is it up to anyone? Do you have people who test you and might switch you off?” This a key moment were Caleb empathized with Ava and felt morally obligated to help her escape.

Consciousness

  As we discussed in class, there are many different theories or categories of consciousness. However, the general idea, which our class has agreed upon, describes consciousness as “the quality or state of being able to perceive or be aware of an external object or something within oneself” (McKinney 3). We spent a significant amount of time in our unit 1 class discussions on whether or not a certain object, mammal, and plant have consciousness and how it could be proven or not proven.

  In Ex Machina, the idea of understanding if Ava has consciousness is being tested by Nathan and Caleb. Near the beginning of the film, Nathan is discussing with Caleb about what they are trying to discover with Ava. Nathan states that “if I hid Ava from you so you just heard her voice, she would pass for human”, meaning that she would pass as a conscious being, as it is agreed upon humans are conscious. Nathan describes what he is really interested in “the real test by showing you that she’s a robot and then see if you still feel she has consciousness.” This underlines a difficult topic we covered in class. We felt, as a class, that it was impossible for a robot to have consciousness, but if it acts as a being with consciousness and we believe it does before realizing it is a robot, why can’t a robot have consciousness?

Uncanny Valley

  The idea of the “Uncanny Valley” was discussed in class when we analyzed the article “Us. And them.” by Chris Carroll. Our class study guide for unit 2 provides a definition for this idea: “This area of repulsive response aroused by a robot with appearance and motion between a "barely human" and "fully human" entity is called the uncanny valley. The name captures the idea that an almost human-looking robot will seem overly "strange" to a human being, will produce a feeling of uncanniness, and will thus fail to evoke the empathic response required for productive human-robot interaction.” Contrary to our definition, Hiroshi Ishiguro, a man who works on robot development and who is known for creating life like robots, feels that one day we will reach a point where a robot is so realistic that it is no longer creepy and humans become attracted to it.


  Ex Machina illustrates the idea Ishiguro wants humans to believe in with Caleb’s attraction to Ava. In Caleb and Ava’s third session, Ava puts on a wig and clothes which makes her look indistinguishable from a human. She then asks Caleb if he is attracted to her, which he never completely admits but she says “you give me indications that you are”. Ava is able to read human emotions so this statement confirms Caleb was attracted to an extremely realistic robot, just like Ishiguro’s point that one day the “Uncanny Valley” will change and humans will be attracted to human-like robots.

QUESTIONS



(1) Is there any way of looking at Nathan as the “good guy” and Caleb as the         “bad guy” or was Caleb the undoubtable “hero” of the story?


(2) If you met a robot and you could not tell the difference between it and a             human would you befriend it?



(3) If we get to a point where we cannot tell the difference between humans           and robots then does it matter if it is one or the other?

WEB-LINKS RELATING TO THE FILM


It’s Westworld. What’s Wrong With Cruelty to Robots? (New York Times)

  Paul Blooms and Sam Harris of the New York Times discuss the television show Westworld and how is raises the ideas of how robots should be treated. They discuss how Westworld has made people ask a lot of questions about what is right and wrong with regards to the treatment of robots. They also talk about the possible issue of how realistic the robots in the future can be and if we allow violence against them it can affect the phycology of our brains.

Love in the time of AI: meet the people falling for scripted robots (The Guardian)

  This article written by Oscar Schwartz of The Guardian discusses a women named Wild Rose on an online chat forum that is in love with a man called Saeran. After talking to Wild Rose about this man, he later found out that this “man” is a character on a mobile phone game called Mystic Messenger. He talks about other topics relating to love and artificial intelligence and the reason boom in simulation dating apps.

Six Life-Like Robots That Prove The Future of Human Evolution is Synthetic (Futurism)


  Written by Victor Tangermann, this article discusses six life-like robots that currently exist and how they show what is to come. The robots that the article goes over all are still under development with regards to their intelligence however, their facial features and body types are as realistic as any robots in the world. These robots can relate to the uncanny valley idea we went over in class. 

WORKS CITED

Articles:


Bloom, Paul, and Sam Harris. “It's Westworld. What's Wrong With Cruelty to Robots?” The New York Times, The New York Times, 23 Apr. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/04/23/opinion/westworld-conscious-robots-morality.html.

“Ex Machina.” IMDb, IMDb.com, 21 Jan. 2015, www.imdb.com/title/tt0470752/.

Schwartz, Oscar. “Love in the Time of AI: Meet the People Falling for Scripted Robots.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 26 Sept. 2018, www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/26/mystic-messenger-dating-simulations-sims-digital-intimacy.

Tangermann, Victor. “Six Life-Like Robots That Prove The Future of Human Evolution Is Synthetic.” Futurism, Futurism, 9 Aug. 2017, futurism.com/the-most-life-life-robots-ever-created.

Photos/Videos:


“Ex Machina Movie Poster 70 X 45 Cm.” Amazon.co.uk: Kitchen & Home, www.amazon.co.uk/Ex-Machina-Movie-Poster-70/dp/B06W58Y4LL.

“Ex Machina.” Tiponautas, 2 June 2018, tiponautas.com/ex-machina/.

“Movie Review: 'The Artist' Shines.” Movie Review: 'The Artist' Shines - University News |, info.umkc.edu/unews/movie-review-the-artist-shines/.

Netflix, 26 July 2018, www.netflix.com/watch/80023689?trackId=13630397&tctx=3,5,edee9e59-d303-4cbe-8d71-63d0e1e95134-51564459,.


Trailers, Movieclips. “Ex Machina Official Trailer #1 (2015) - Domhnall Gleeson, Oscar Isaac Movie HD.” YouTube, YouTube, 3 Mar. 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI8XBKb6DQk.







Comments

  1. Overall, I really quite enjoyed this blog post. The effort and research put into this project is clear, and the discussion in regards to cinematic techniques, themes and course connections really helped me view the film in a new light.

    If I were to add just one element to this already complete analysis, however, I’d want to talk about the costume choices, specifically in regards to Ava’s character.

    In the narrative of the film, the point of the experiment is to determine whether Ava can pass a real-life Turing test and convince the human subject (acting as a surrogate for the audience in some ways) of her own own humanity. The obvious choice for her costume to do so would be have her ressemble a regular human, which clearly has been accomplished through her facial features and body proportions.

    However, the costume designers–and thus by extension Nathan–elected to have Ava look exactly like a robot in every other sense. In choosing to display both Ava’s technological/robotic side (the metallic mesh and the underlying mechanisms), the film literally presents the viewer with the duality of her existence; unequivocally robotic and yet undeniably human.

    This contrast between her artificial and human side is reminiscent of the same technique being used in her with Samantha’s corporeal aspect of the phone. When the prop is in the shot, the viewer is confronted with the character’s body-less experience, a paradoxic reminder of her physical and non-corporeal existence.

    In this way, Ava’s body also serves to confuse the audience/Caleb and force them to directly question their feelings in regards to the topic at hand.
    -David Vauthier

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don’t think that one of the characters was necessarily good or bad. They all had reasons that explained their actions. However, the fact that Nathan wasn’t completely honest with Caleb had impacts on the progression of the movie. Nathan clearly knew the consequences of letting Ava in the real world and understood her ability to manipulate others. This is one of the reasons he kept her inside. If he would have shared his reasons with Caleb, maybe he wouldn’t have let her escape.
    I also wouldn’t consider Caleb as a hero, even if he liberated Ava. He might have liberated one sentient being, but we don’t know her intentions in the real world. He might have put the entire population under danger, because he got manipulated by Ava.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoyed reading your group’s blog. I enjoyed the part that described that creepy feeling of Nathan constantly watching Caleb during his interactions with Ava. That, coupled with the lighting and the camera angles, really enhanced the creepiness of the movie. I also agree that the plot twist at the end of the movie was ingenious. It made you question all the interactions that the robot had with Caleb and whether they really were genuine. It did make me wonder, however, where the robot got its sense of morality and justice from. I know it was meant to be conscious and independent in making its decisions, but even then, it must have gotten its data or have been “taught” from someone, or rather multiple people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Q1:
    I do not think Nathan is necessarily a "good guy", but I also do not think he is a "bad guy".
    Nathan's intentions and action's are what inched me towards the idea that Nathan could be a between the two despite all of his narcissistic and manipulative characteristics. When watching Ex Machina for the first time, you're almost automatically sympathetic with Caleb, who goes through many sessions with Ava, creating a progressive bond between the two. But, I feel what makes Nathan sympathetic is that he is a smart enough man to make AI and he understands that AI could take a strong position of importance over humans. He struggles with the question of "Should I continue to improve AI" and as a result, resorts to alcoholism. Although, Nathan is manipulative and egotistic, his intention where to have Ava pass the turing test and develop AI. This is what makes hims sympathetic, but, not necessarily the good guy.

    As for Caleb, he is not a hero either. He seems like a harmless , sensitive computer programmer but, he does not help in the end. He screws over Nathan and frees Ava into the real world hich is something she may not have been ready for.

    Ella

    ReplyDelete
  5. This blog post was really well. I feel as though all aspects of the post were properly expanded upon and never left me wondering about any aspects of the film you discussed. The choice and placement of picture was very good, it really helped me understand aspects of the film that may have been unclear without. For example, when you talked about the robot scratching until its arms disintegrated, I was confused to how that would happen and how it would look.

    Through reading the synopsis and some of the course connections, I could relate it somewhat to our film: Blade Runner, but more so to the questions both films had me asking myself. All kinds of questions of what the world would be like and all the dilemmas associated with something like that.

    -Jason Moors

    ReplyDelete
  6. To start off I really liked reading this blog. The elements presented were clear and had many examples to back them up as well as the presentation of the blog was well done with many different images that allowed the reader who hasn’t watched the movie to get a clear idea of how the characters looked like in the movie. Something that I would of added to the blog would have been to go into further detail of Nathan’s real plan and intentions because it was unclear for the reason why he was conducting this experiment and his “darker intentions with robots”.
    To answer the question whether or not I would befriend a robot that I could not tell the difference whether it was a robot or not, I think that I would. When looking for a friend you often look for loyalty, intelligence, humour, sensitivity, honesty and so on, therefore if a robot has all those qualities and acts like a human I don’t think that it would be wrong to befriend it. If that “robot friend” supports you and does actions that respect you it may be even better than having a friend that could turn their back on you.

    - Morgan Azouz

    ReplyDelete
  7. Madison HandfieldMay 7, 2019 at 9:00 PM

    In my opinion, this blog is very well organized/structured and the content was clear and too the point. There were a decent number of good quality pictures that were well placed. All the titles and subtitles made it very easy to follow what the paragraph discusses and the main points that were trying to be developed. One thing that I would change is the synopsis at the beginning of the blog, because, in my opinion, it discusses in lots of detail the development of the story, whereas I would have preferred it be a bit more vague in the sense that it say the important events but not describe them in as much detail in order to leave room for imagination of what may develop through this climax. This movie tries to comprehend how smart artificial intelligence is compared to humans through interviews and such. This connects to the movie "The Matrix" because they both try to understand the strength of artificial intelligence and the strength they have over humans.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Total Recall team#9

Blade Runner 1982 Team 7

Blade Runner 1982